We then get into optional commodity capabilities, based on the size and scale: Will the industry benefit from commoditizing core package manager capabilities into Artifact Services? Package managers commodities:
#Oras renamer how to
Whether an artifact author should have to build one, or figure out how to enable it in an existing one is just one challenge.Ĭan the industry benefit from standards where most new artifact types could be stored in a generalized artifact registry? There’s a long list of ever increasing requirements to be placed on package managers. For each new artifact type, should the artifact authors have to think about how they’ll store, discover and distribute their artifacts? Should the artifact development teams have to incorporate how they’ll provide the increasing number of compliance requirements in these new package manager services? Is there a private version, which can be hosted locally? Will cloud service providers be expected to host these services? Would users be willing to pay for these services? Is the user expected to manage each of these individual services with varying degrees of capabilities, configuration and support? Generalized Artifact Registries Helm, OPA, WASM, Nydus, SCIM, GitOps, SBoM ( SPDX, CycloneDX), Security Scan Results ( CVRF) are just a sampling of new artifact types. To facilitate faster development and deployment, new projects and products surface each month, often with a new artifact type. Developers of products, projects and services are continually being asked to increase the capabilities in a shorter amount of time. In the fast-paced, Cloud Native development process, end-users expect products and services to evolve quickly. Consistency Across Artifact Types, Products, Clouds and Services The best practices and tooling of consuming public content needs to evolve to make the safe and secure decision the easy and default decision. One major difference with cloud native development, is the quick iteration and the assumption that public content can be acquired real-time, from an internal “secured” build system or within a production environment. The user chooses when to consume updates, with both good and bad side effects. At this point, the user has possession of the content, and isn’t subject to the reliability or security posture of the public content at any future point.
#Oras renamer download
Users would download content and host it internally on a shared folder, a website or some other internal location within the users network boundaries. Users have consumed public content long before cloud native development.
The consumption of public content is neither new, or unique. The how is encumbered with a breadth of questions from whether the public content can be trusted, to whether it will it be available when it’s needed. The challenge is not if or when someone consumes public content, rather how. Container Registries –> Artifact Registries Cloud Native EvolutionĪs the industry moves forward with cloud native development, the idea of consuming public content is becoming the norm. In this article I’ll offer a view for why any single new package manager isn’t a great idea, but a generalized artifact package manager is an idea, long in the making.
0 kommentar(er)
